ISO14001: A Deterrent against Environmental Degradation

ISO14001: A Deterrent against Environmental Degradation

Over the last few years, ISO 14001 has gained considerable support of business communities and governments worldwide. Business communities consider it a catalyst which ensures continued business and provides an opportunity to boost trade with customers overseas. Governments look at it as a useful agent to soften the local industry to comply with environmental legislation.

ISO 14001 is being pushed as an agenda, therefore, which will help in lowering environmental impacts that occur because of the manufacturing sector. On the surface, the picture is quite rosy.

For large manufacturers adopting ISO 14001 is quite practical and makes economic sense. The major assumption while formulating the ISO 14001 was that there is no informal manufacturing sector (because of poor representation and inactive role of the developing countries at TC207). Informal sector in Pakistan is a major component of the manufacturing sector and provides useful support to the formal sector. The informal sector exists within the populated areas, making it extremely hard to regulate. Therefore, the environmental impacts due to this sector are quite significant.

ISO 14001 requires the suppliers of a manufacturer to have an Environmental Management System (EMS) in place as well. For a supplier operating from a small facility in a congested area and meager resources, how can s/he be expected to hire a consultant to develop an EMS? In a country which has a significant informal manufacturing sector, high unemployment due to deteriorating economic condition, high inflation, limited resources, weak monitoring agencies and deteriorating infra-structure, with all these constraints, how is it possible for the manufacturing sector to adopt ISO 14001 in it’s true spirit?

Even if a manufacturer adopts the ISO 14001, what is the guarantee that s/he will get business? What is the incentive for the non-exporting manufacturers to adopt ISO 14001? How can the industry be convinced that ISO 14001 is an opportunity not an obstacle? Considering all these factors, this paper will analyze the current status of ISO 14001 adoption in Pakistan, reasons for adoption, deterrents in adoption, and recommendations on how those deterrents can either be removed or minimized, and it’s overall impact on the environment and economy.

Environmental Aspects In ISO 14001 Standards EMS

Environmental Aspects In ISO 14001 Standards EMS

First make lists of the environmental aspects (issues) that are relevant

to the business. The environmental review mentioned earlier should

provide most of this information and the Annex to ISO 14001 provides

guidance on the format for doing this.

Consider the inputs, outputs and processes/activities of the business in

relation to;

a) emissions to air

b) releases to water

c) waste management

d) contamination of land

e) use of raw materials and natural resources

f) other local environmental and community issues

Consider both site (direct) and offsite (ie. indirect) aspects that you

control or have influence over (such as suppliers) and in relation to

normal operations, shut-down and start-up conditions and reasonably

foreseeable and emergencies situations

A simple written procedure is then required to determine which of the

aspects identified are really or probably significant (important) and should

therefore be managed by the EMS. This process which is

similar to health and safety risk assessment ranks the aspects by order

of importance and the significant aspects identified are then the core

of the environmental management system.

There are various methods of determining significance but most are

based on the principle of attributing a relative value for the

environmental hazard or potential to cause harm (eg. on a scale of 1-

5) and the risk or likelihood of occurrence (eg. on a scale of 1-5). The

relative significance is then determined by multiplying the hazard by

the risk. (eg. max score of 25). An arbitrary but cautious threshold

value is then set above which environmental aspects are considered to

be significant. This threshold can be determined by a common sense

consideration of the aspects identified.

ISO 14001 Standard & Environmental Issues

ISO 14001 Standard & Environmental Issues

ISO 14001 is a systematic tool that enables an organization in any market sector to focus on their situation, identify the relevant environmental issues and to lessen their impact to their benefit and the environment. It is part of a global response to the recognition that we are damaging the environment in which we all live. The cause and effect of the foremost world environmental issues, which are all due to mankind, are generally too vast and too intangible for us to grasp and so the slightly cliché expression ‘think global, act local’ is very relevant. Once the EMS is implemented and to become registered to ISO 14001, the external auditor will assess your EMS in two separate stages, on site. The first stage to understand your business activities and determine formal readiness for assessment and the second to check practical compliance with ISO 14001. After registration he will return at regular intervals every year to verify continual improvement and regulatory compliance, against your set objectives and your EMS. The external auditor should be seen as a wise friend, not a policeman. He should certainly explain his findings and assist the company to find ISO 14001 registration is not a cure for all environmental problems but I hope I’ve demonstrated that it is a worthwhile, if not essential business initiative that could enable your management to better manage your business, gain commercial advantage and minimize its environmental impact.

The Challenge Of ISO 14001 Standards

The Challenge Of ISO 14001 Standards

The building blocks of an environmental management system is an understanding of aspects and impacts.

Implementing ISO 14001 begins with identifying how an organisation’s business activities impact on the

environment.

Many organisations believe they are already aware of the significant aspects and impacts of their operations.

The process of implementing ISO 14001 may uncover significant impacts not previously identified and allows

for a consistent approach to analysis.

Generally this analysis is done department by department or centre by centre.

It is best if it is a team approach that involves the employees who do the activity. An employee’s

familiarity with a task is essential for both the identification of the environmental impacts of business

activities and the determination or implementation of control measures.

An aspect is any element of an organisation’s activities, products or services that can interact with the

environment.

An impact is the change caused to the environment.

Impacts may occur during normal and abnormal operating conditions, such as accidents and emergencies.

Aspects can often be isolated by analysing the inputs and outputs of an activity.

EVALUATION OF IMPACTS

Once the impacts have been determined they have to be evaluated.

Criteria for evaluation include environmental concerns such as the severity of the impact, and business

concerns such as potential regulatory and legal exposure, the probability of the impact occurring, the

cost of changing the impact and effect on public image.

This type of evaluation highlights the significant impacts. These, in turn, determine the significant

aspects. Once the significant aspects have been determined, targets and objectives can be set.

Monitoring and Measurement In ISO 14001 Standards

Monitoring and Measurement In ISO 14001 Standards

The Monitoring and Measurement section contains two requirements:

1) Measurement and monitoring of environmental performance associated with operations that can have a significant impact on the environment; and

2) Calibration and maintenance of equipment used for environmental monitoring and measurement.

Monitoring and Measuring of Performance — This section calls for a“procedure to monitor and measure… key characteristics of… operations that can have a significant impact on the environment.”

Note that the section does not specifically require the organization to monitor and measure the significant environmental impacts of its products or services. As a practical matter, however, organizations should establish measurements over all environmental aspects that they determine are significant irrespective of whether the impacts relate to an activity, product, or service.

This section also requires the documentation“of information to monitor performance, applicable operational controls, and… environmental objectives and targets.” §4.6,

Management Review, requires that environmental performance and achievement of objectives and targets become inputs into the Management Review (sub-sections c & d).

Calibration and Maintenance — The requirement of having a calibration system is to ensure that measurements are reliable and accurate. A calibration system may be developed following these steps:

· Identification of measurements to be made;

· Identification of equipment, instruments, hardware and software to be used;

· Identification of the testing methods to be used;

· Determination of the accuracy and precision required or desired;

· Definition of calibration procedures;

· Use of the system;

· Establishment of records;

· If equipment is found to be out of calibration, corrective action; and

· Improvement of the system as necessary.

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.

Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.

INTEGRATING THE NATURAL STEP ELEMENTS INTO ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

In 1988, Dr. Karl-Henrik Robert began the process of developing the principles and objectives that have become known as The Natural Step.

Robert convened a group of over 100 Swedish scientists and asked them to develop a vision for a sustainable society based on the scientific principles. The Natural Step framework (Robert, 1991) was the result of this effort and is becoming widely recognized.

In this framework, there are four underlying principles or conditions and four guiding objectives.

These system conditions are:

Nature should not be subject to systematically increasing concentrations of substances extracted from the Earth’s crust;

Nature should not be subject to increasing concentrations of substances produced by society;

Nature should not be subject to systematically increasing degradation by physical means; and

People should not be subject to conditions that systematically undermine their capacity to meet their needs.

These conditions can be converted to four objectives that are more easily understood:

Eliminate our community’s contribution to fossil fuel dependency and to the wasteful use of scarce metals and minerals;

Eliminate our community’s contribution to dependency upon persistent chemicals and the wasteful use of synthetic substances;

Eliminate our community’s contribution to encroachment upon nature; and Meet human needs fairly and efficiently.

To apply The Natural Step, Boisvert et al. (1999) recommend an A-B-C-D approach: Awareness, Baseline Analysis, Compelling Vision, and Down to Action. Kent County chose to align its program with The Natural Step because of its simplicity and scientific basis.

An environmental management system (EMS) is a set of processes and practices that enable an organization to reduce the environmental impacts from its operations and increase efficiency. It helps the organization to systematically manage its environmental “footprint.” Alternatively, according to the ISO definition (ISO, 2004) an EMS is “a part of an organization’s management system used to develop and implement its environmental policy and manage its environmental aspects.” It is built upon the concept of continuous improvement and follows a four element Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle. The EMS is an evolving process and is consistently modified to accommodate new information, changing circumstances and changes in organization priorities.

The critical components of each of the four elements are:

Planning, includes identifying environmental aspects and establishing goals [Plan];

Implementing, includes training and operational controls [Do];

Checking, includes monitoring and corrective action [Check]; and

Reviewing, includes progress reviews and acting to make needed changes to the EMS [Act].

There are a variety of reasons that an organization may develop and implement an EMS. The reasons are many and varied and often depend upon the type of organization. A business with international offices has different reasons than a public agency to develop and implement an EMS. Table 1 provides a list of the most common of these reasons.

Some disadvantages to developing and implementing an EMS relate to the costs associated with development of the program and include:

An investment of internal resources, including staff/employee time;

Costs for training of personnel;

Costs associated with hiring consulting assistance, if needed; and

Costs for technical resources to analyze environmental impacts and improvement options, if needed.

Critical factors that assure the success of any management system include:

Commitment from senior management;

Designated staff including a Core team to act as a cheerleader and a representative trained in the program;

Involvement of all employees in the covered fenceline;

Dedicated resources;

A link to the overall strategic planning of the organization;

Sufficient time to develop and implement the program;

Proper follow through on the checking and acting components; and

A willingness to make the cultural shift required for the program to succeed.

The ISO 14001 guidance lists 17 elements, shown in Table 2, as the foundation of an EMS.

Several documents and publications cover the various elements of an EMS in detail. One of these is the US EPA publication “Achieving Environmental Excellence: An Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Handbook for Wastewater Utilities,”

ISO 9001 / ISO 14001 Video

Watch ISO 14001 Video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUxbyQUGSnU

Watch ISO 9001 Video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8WI2MgyS7w

Key Elements of ISO 14001

Key Elements Of ISO 14001
The Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority; Legal and Other Requirements; Evaluation of Compliance; and Nonconformity, Corrective Action and Preventive Action elements of ISO 14001 are all essential to the ongoing effectiveness of the EMS. This section describes how they function within the overall scheme.
1. Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority (ISO 14001:2004, ?4.4.1)
?4.4.1 of ISO 14001 establishes three important requirements:
1. That management ensure the availability of resources to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the EMS;
2. That roles, responsibilities, and authorities be defined, documented, and communicated in order to facilitate effective environmental management; and
3. That top management appoint a management representative(s) who, irrespective of other responsibilities, will have responsibility and authority for implementing and maintaining the EMS and for reporting to top management on the performance of the EMS.
Ensuring Availability of Resources – Provision of resources for the EMS is almost always an issue within organizations. Although top management usually understands and accepts, at least in principle, the requirement to provide resources, the level of management that makes decisions on capital deployment and operating budgets often does not subscribe to the same requirement. Making the case for resources typically requires the implementation team or management representative to quantify intangibles such as the avoided cost of regulatory fines or the value to the environment of reducing environmental impacts.
When considering the requirement to provide resources, especially financial resources, it may be important to recognize that ISO 14001 requires the provision of resources for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS, not necessarily resources to correct or prevent environmental impacts or to register to ISO 14001. When contemplating the cost of implementing ISO 14001, organizations, again, should think in terms of three separate cost categories:
1) Internal labor and external consultant costs to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the policy and procedural elements of ISO 14001;
2) Capital costs for correction or prevention of environmental impacts; and
3) Costs of registration to ISO 14001, if the organization elects to register.
Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities – In the past, some organizations have employed a practice of not delegating responsibility and authority for environmental affairs to specific management representatives, reasoning that if the responsibility was diffused throughout the organization, no one person could become personally accountable for non-compliance with regulations or for environmental liabilities. §4.4.1 of ISO 14001 limits such ‘willful ignorance’ by requiring top management of the organization to appoint “specific management representative(s)” to ensure that the EMS is implemented and that top management be apprised of EMS performance. It also requires that the delegation of responsibility and authority be documented and communicated, thus eliminating circumstances where responsibility and authority for the EMS are diffuse or uncertain.
When §4.4.1 is read together with the requirement of the Environmental Policy for a commitment to comply with applicable legal requirements, §4.3.2, Legal and Other
Requirements, requiring a procedure for identifying legal requirements (following), and §4.5.2, Evaluation of Compliance, requiring a procedure for evaluating regulatory compliance, it is evident that the management representative is also responsible for ensuring that the organization is in compliance with applicable regulations. While this responsibility and authority can be delegated, the chain of delegation begins with top management and is passed to the management representative, effectively eliminating any uncertainty as to who is responsible and authorized to ensure regulatory compliance.
EMS Organizational Structure – There is an almost universal norm for the management structure of the EMS organization under ISO 14001. It begins with the top management position, proceeds to the top manager’s leadership team, and then to an EMS implementation team that is generally chaired by the management representative. The departments making up the relevant functions and levels of the organization and environmental, safety, and health professionals comprise the typical implementation team.
Defining Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities for the EMS – In defining, documenting, and communicating EMS roles, responsibilities, and authorities, it makes sense to begin with top management and proceed through all of the positions having EMS responsibilities. Following is a generic example of how roles, responsibilities, and authorities might be documented and communicated in an EMS Procedures Manual:
Plant Manager
Authority: The Plant Manager has the authority, responsibility, and accountability for managing all aspects of ABC Company’s activities, products, and services at the Anytown facility.Source: Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, ABC Company, Inc.
EMS Responsibilities: Under the requirements of ISO 14001, the Plant Manager shall be specifically responsible for:
1) Defining the Environmental Policy;
2) Delegating authority and responsibility for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS;
3) Providing human, technological, infrastructure, and financial resources and specialized skills; and
4) Periodically reviewing the EMS for suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness and directing changes as necessary to achieve the goals for an EMS and the commitment to continual improvement.
Leadership Team
EMS Responsibilities: The Leadership Team shall advise the Plant Manager on the exercise by
the Plant Manager of his/her responsibilities for the EMS.
Management Representative, Implementation and Maintenance Responsibilities
EMS Authority: The Plant Manager delegates to the Manager, the authority
to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the Environmental Management System and to
ensure that it conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. In the context of ISO 14001, the
Manager, shall be the Management Representative.

Document and Data Control in ISO 9000 & ISO 14001

The organization shall establish and maintain procedures for controlling all documents and data required by ISO 9000 & ISO 14001
a) they can be located;
b) they are periodically reviewed, revised as necessary, and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel;
c) current versions of relevant documents and data are available at all locations where operations essential to the effective functioning of the OH&S system are performed;
d) obsolete documents and data are promptly removed from all points of issue and points of use, or otherwise assured against unintended use;
e) archival documents and data retained for legal or knowledge preservation purposes, are suitably identified.
Accidents, incidents, non-conformances and corrective and preventive action
The organization shall implement and record any changes in the documented procedures resulting from corrective and preventive action.
Documents required by the ISO 9000 & ISO 14001 shall be controlled. Records are a special type of document and shall be controlled in accordance with the requirements.
The organization shall establish, implement and maintain procedure[s] to:
a) approve documents for adequacy prior to use;
b) review and update as necessary and re-approve documents;
c) ensure that changes and the current revisions status of documents are identified;
d.) ensure that relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use;
e.) ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable;
f.) ensure that documents of external origin determined by the organization to be necessary for the planning and operation of the ISO 9000 & ISO 14001 management system are identified and their distribution controlled, and
g.) prevent the unintended use of obsolete documents and apply suitable identification to them if they are retained for any purpose.

The Future of ISO 14001

ISO 14001 has the potential to reframe the conduct of environmental management. It has proven to be an elegant document that anticipates the needs of organizations of all sizes and purposes for direction on environmental management.
As ISO 14001 gains credibility as an effective system for managing and improving environmental performance, environmental regulators will be encouraged to accept registration to ISO 14001 in satisfaction of some regulatory administrative requirements and, thus, reduce the burden of compliance for those organizations that are managing their environmental exposures.
Ultimately, the greatest strides in environmental performance improvement and sustainability will come as a consequence of millions of organizations – municipalities, colleges and universities, governmental departments, and property owners and operators as well as industrial corporations – identifying and managing the environmental impacts of their activities, services, and products.

Understanding the ISO 14001 Standard

ISO 14001 is an international voluntary standard that specifies the minimum elements for an environmental management system. It was published in 1996 by the International Organization for Standardization and is being taken up by organizations throughout the world at varying speeds.
The above is accepted as true by most people who are aware of the standard. Beyond these simple facts, however, there are many misconceptions about ISO 14001. For instance:
ISO 14001 will be a requirement for all companies.As with ISO 9000, conformance to ISO 14001 may become a condition of doing business in certain countries, regions or markets. This process already has begun in some industrial sectors, such as the automotive and electronics markets. However, there are still a tremendous number of companies in business today that do not conform to ISO 9000, even though that standard is now 13 years old. Thus it is too early to tell how widely ISO 14001 will be required in the future.
Implementing ISO 14001 means getting a registration.Many suppliers choose to demonstrate conformance to ISO 14001 through third-party certification. Some customers may require this. However, the standard itself considers a company’s self-declaration of conformance as an acceptable alternative. Further, some companies simply use the ISO 14001 model for internal purposes as a means to enhance their environmental performance.
ISO 14001 is just paperwork and won’t really help my company.ISO 14001 is like many things in life – you get out of it what you put into it. The way a company implements the standard determines what benefits it receives. Many companies that have implemented ISO 14001 report a variety of benefits, including improved environmental performance, greater operating efficiency, cost reduction, improved employee awareness and enhanced public image, among others.
Implementing ISO 14001 means throwing out our current environmental programs.ISO 14001 criteria specify “what to do,” not “how to do it.” Implementation approaches vary widely. There is no reason to think that your existing approach to environmental management must be put aside to satisfy ISO 14001.

The ISO 14000 Challenge

The building blocks of an environmental management system is an understanding of aspects and impacts.
Implementing ISO 14001 begins with identifying how an organisation’s business activities impact on the
environment.
Many organisations believe they are already aware of the significant aspects and impacts of their operations.
The process of implementing ISO 14001 may uncover significant impacts not previously identified and allows
for a consistent approach to analysis.
Generally this analysis is done department by department or centre by centre.
It is best if it is a team approach that involves the employees who do the activity. An employee’s
familiarity with a task is essential for both the identification of the environmental impacts of business
activities and the determination or implementation of control measures.
An aspect is any element of an organisation’s activities, products or services that can interact with the
environment.
An impact is the change caused to the environment.
Impacts may occur during normal and abnormal operating conditions, such as accidents and
emergencies.
Aspects can often be isolated by analysing the inputs and outputs of an activity.
EVALUATION OF IMPACTS
Once the impacts have been determined they have to be evaluated.
Criteria for evaluation include environmental concerns such as the severity of the impact, and business
concerns such as potential regulatory and legal exposure, the probability of the impact occurring, the
cost of changing the impact and effect on public image.
This type of evaluation highlights the significant impacts. These, in turn, determine the significant
aspects. Once the significant aspects have been determined, targets and objectives can be set.

Implementing ISO 14001

ISO 14001 is an internationally recognised standard that provides a framework for a strategic approach to corporate environmental management. This standard gives organisations the means to identify and control their environmental impacts, improve performance and achieve their objectives and targets. The standard is independently audited, giving it great strength and integrity.
Due to its widespread adoption (e.g. Barclays, Credit Suisse and UBS in the financial sector), it now acts as a common reference for communication about environmental issues. ISO 14001 provides assurance to stakeholders on environmental claims and helps organisations meet requirements laid down by clients and investors.
Adoption of ISO 14001 is being driven by stakeholder concerns as well as the significant benefits on offer to adopters. Few companies are now exempt from government, client and investor demands for accountability and improved environmental performance. With brand and reputation on the line, it is a risky strategy to ignore these concerns.
However, choosing how to act is not a straightforward decision. Companies that rushed to announce their green credentials without independent verification and transparency fell foul of greenwash accusations and suffered perhaps more damage to their reputation than had they not acted in the first place. In response to this, many companies are now choosing to implement internationally recognised and independently audited environmental management systems such as ISO 14001.
The benefits of implementing ISO 14001 are extensive:
It immediately enhances corporate reputation and sends a clear signal of commitment to corporate responsibility. Accusations of greenwash are prevented by the transparent and robust approach of the standard.
Proactive environmental management increases attractiveness to investors, especially for Socially Responsible Investment (SRI), an area already accounting for £9 billion investment per year in the UK alone.
ISO 14001 accreditation may also bring financial benefits through increased market share. Firms can differentiate themselves from competitors as responsible companies as well as securing the rewards of first mover advantage in new markets. In addition, many buyers are now implementing sustainable procurement codes and stipulating conditions in Requests for Information (RFIs) where suppliers are required to have environmental credentials. Gaining ISO 14001 accreditation ensures access to environmentally demanding but high reward markets.
Financial benefits are not limited to increased investment and sales. Implementation of an EMS may produce significant cost savings that actually negate the initial outlay. With energy and waste prices rising sharply, environmental responsibility can produce a win:win opportunity.
Perhaps the most significant benefit for many will be the positive effect on attracting and retaining staff. With intense competition for the best staff, corporate responsibility is becoming a key criterion against which employers are judged.
Finally, responsible environmental management is quickly becoming a necessary condition for business, a socially accepted norm of behaviour. Those who fail to follow these norms risk damage to their reputation and the possibility of their social licence to operate being revoked.
A standard as thorough and robust as ISO 14001 has an equally thorough implementation process with extensive requirements for procedures and auditable document trails. Implementation follows the Plan-Do-Check-Review cycle and key required procedures are detailed in the diagram below. Implementation will entail the creation of at least 20 procedures and supporting documents. The procedures are all company-specific and must be tailored to suit individual operations. It is this level of detail that gives the standard such strength and integrity.

Document and Data Control in ISO 9000 & ISO 14001

The organization shall establish and maintain procedures for controlling all documents and data required by ISO 9000 & ISO 14001
a) they can be located;
b) they are periodically reviewed, revised as necessary, and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel;
c) current versions of relevant documents and data are available at all locations where operations essential to the effective functioning of the OH&S system are performed;
d) obsolete documents and data are promptly removed from all points of issue and points of use, or otherwise assured against unintended use;
e) archival documents and data retained for legal or knowledge preservation purposes, are suitably identified.
Accidents, incidents, non-conformances and corrective and preventive action
The organization shall implement and record any changes in the documented procedures resulting from corrective and preventive action.
Documents required by the ISO 9000 & ISO 14001 shall be controlled. Records are a special type of document and shall be controlled in accordance with the requirements.
The organization shall establish, implement and maintain procedure[s] to:
a) approve documents for adequacy prior to use;
b) review and update as necessary and re-approve documents;
c) ensure that changes and the current revisions status of documents are identified;
d.) ensure that relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use;
e.) ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable;
f.) ensure that documents of external origin determined by the organization to be necessary for the planning and operation of the ISO 9000 & ISO 14001 management system are identified and their distribution controlled, and
g.) prevent the unintended use of obsolete documents and apply suitable identification to them if they are retained for any purpose.

ISO 14001:2004 Document Control System

Documents required by the environmental management system and by this international standard shall be controlled. Records are a special type of document and shall be controlled in accordance with the requirements given in 4.5.4 (Control of Records).
The organization shall establish, implement, and maintain a procedure(s) to
a) approve documents for adequacy prior to issue;
b) review and update as necessary and re-approve documents;
c) ensure that changes and the current revision status of documents are identified;
d) ensure that relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use;
e) ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable;
f) ensure that documents of external origin determined by the organization to be necessary for the planning and operation of the environmental management system are identified and their distribution controlled; and
g) prevent the unintended use of obsolete documents and apply suitable identification to them if they are retained for any purpose. [ISO 14001, 4.4.5]
http://www.iso-consults.com
http://www.e-wia.com

What Is an Environment Management System (EMS) ?

An EMS can be described as a program of continuous environmental improvement that follows a defined sequence of steps drawn from established project management practice and routinely applied in business
management. In simple terms these steps are as follows:
• Review the environmental consequences of the operations.
• Define a set of policies and objectives for environmental performance.
• Establish an action plan to achieve the objectives.
• Monitor performance against these objectives.
• Report the results appropriately.
• Review the system and the outcomes and strive for continuous improvement.
Not every system will present these steps in exactly the same way, but the basic principles are clear and easily understandable.
The ISO 14000 series is a series of standards for different aspects of environmental management. A number of these standards relating to environmental management systems have been adopted formally by
the members of the ISO, while others are in different stages of preparation.
The standards that have been adopted are (as of early 1997):
ISO 14001-1996 Environmental management systems:
specification with guidance for use
ISO 14004-1996 Environmental management systems:
general guidelines on principles, systems, and supporting techniques
ISO 14010-1996 Guidelines for environmental auditing:
general principles of environmental auditing
ISO 14011-1996 Guidelines for environmental auditing:
audit procedures; auditing of environmental management systems.
ISO 14012-1996 Guidelines for environmental auditing:
qualification criteria for environmental auditors Standards currently available as draft international standards:
ISO 14021 Environmental labels and declarations:
self-declaration environmental claims; guidelines and definition and usage of terms.
ISO 14040 Environmental management: life cycle assessment; principles and framework
ISO 14050 Environmental management: vocabulary More than half a dozen others in this series have been drafted and are under discussion.

ISO 14001 STANDARD

is in fact a series of international standards on environmental management. It provides a framework for the development of an [url=htttp://www.iso9001store.com/]environmental management system[/url] and the supporting audit programme.
The ISO 14001 series emerged primarily as a result of the Uruguay round of the GATT negotiations and the Rio Summit on the Environment held in 1992. While GATT concentrates on the need to reduce non-tariff barriers to trade, the Rio Summit generated a commitment to protection of the environment across the world.
After the rapid acceptance of ISO 9000, and the increase of environmental standards around the world, the International Standards Organisation (ISO) assessed the need for international environmental management standards. They formed the Strategic Advisory Group on the Environment (SAGE) in 1991, to consider whether such standards could serve to:
Promote a common approach to environmental management similar to quality management;Enhance organizations’ ability to attain and measure improvements in environmental performance; andFacilitate trade and remove trade barriers.In 1992, SAGE’s recommendations created a new committee, TC 207, for international environmental management standards. This committee and its sub-committees included representatives from industry, standards organizations, government and environmental organizations from many countries. What developed was a series of ISO14000 standards designed to cover:
-environmental management systems-environmental auditing-environmental performance evaluation-environmental labelling-life-cycle assessment-environmental aspects in product standards
ISO 14001 was first published as a standard in 1996 and it specifies the actual requirements for an environmental management system. It applies to those environmental aspects over which an organization has control and where it can be expected to have an influence.
ISO 14001 is often seen as the corner-stone standard of the ISO 14000 series. It specifies a framework of control for an Environmental Management System and is the only ISO 14000 standard against which it is currently possible to be certified by an external certification body. However, it does not in itself state specific environmental performance criteria.

IS0 14001 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT

Firstly ISO 14000 environment system standards was prepared in June of 1992 year in Rio at world apex and this standard brooks decisions of this world apex and Rio contract principles. After 1 year, ISO established one technique committee which is yielded by 50 different country representatives to prepare international environment management system in 1993 year. ISO 14001 environment management system standard was issued in September of 1996 year with works of this committee. ISO 14001 standard is used as voluntary now but ISO 14001 will be burden by coercions of societies, international organizations, states in the future. Levels which environment management system passed are the following briefly:
= Europe community countries issued I action plan in 1973 year (to practice protecting preventions of environment )= BS 7750 Standard in 1992= Rio Declaration in 1992 year= ISO/TC 207. Environmental management technique committee was established in 1993 year to develop ISO 14000 family standards= TS 9719 standard (environment management system – General features) in 1994 year= ISO 14001 standard in 1996 year= ISO 14001 current version in April of 2005 Nisan 2005
The www.iso9001store.com website provided the software very helpful to my company.